Dividendo Planetario/en

Planetary Dividend (PD) is the guaranteed monthly income that every citizen of Earth receives due to their status as a 50% co-owner of the planet and its society with all of humanity.

It's not charity. It's not social assistance. It's your rightful share of humanity's common property.

"The planet is not owned by anyone. Therefore, it belongs to everyone. The Planetary Dividend materializes that co-ownership in a concrete and verifiable economic right."

Radical Ideas for a New System That Challenge Everything You Think You Know About Wealth and Society

What if the system wasn't just broken, but also obsolete?

If you've ever felt like the world is broken, that life is a constant race for survival, and that the rules of the game are rigged, you're not alone. Many of us share that feeling. But what if the problem isn't that the system is broken, but that it suffers from an obsolete design, incapable of managing the complexity and potential of the 21st century?

The "Planetary Demarchy" is not presented as just another ideology, but as a social engineering plan designed from the ground up to solve these fundamental problems. Its goal is to replace the current architecture, based on scarcity and debt, with one that aligns personal benefit with collective well-being through a central driving force: the Common Fund .

In this article, we'll explore five of the most impactful and surprising principles of this system. Prepare to challenge some of your most deeply held beliefs about ownership, money, and society.

You're not fighting for a place in the world, you already own it.

This is the fundamental axiom upon which everything else is built, a principle called Universal Planetary Co-ownership (UPC) . It establishes that the Earth and all its resources—both physical and accumulated knowledge—are the equal and inalienable property of every living human being. This principle radically transforms your status: you cease to be a tenant or a subject on a foreign planet and become a legitimate co-owner of the world.

This right is not a moral ideal, but an "inevitable conclusion of reality" based on three irrefutable axioms:

1. Inheritance Without Choice: We are born into a world we did not create, with resources that preceded us by billions of years.
2. Original Equity: No human being deserves, simply by virtue of being born, more or less than another. The original ownership of the planet therefore belongs to everyone equally.
3. Birthright: Consequently, every citizen is born the legitimate owner of their part of the planet, a right that no one can take away.

"You don't fight for a place in the world. You are born the rightful owner of your part of the planet."

This co-ownership has a direct consequence: if someone wishes to use a common resource exclusively (such as extracting minerals, occupying land, or using the electromagnetic spectrum), they must compensate all other co-owners. This compensation is called the Common Asset Use Royalty (CUAR) and is one of the system's main sources of funding.

You receive a monthly income in your own right, not through charity

As a direct result of being a co-owner of the planet, you receive a guaranteed monthly income. This is the Planetary Dividend (PD) , the economic manifestation of your ownership right

It's crucial to understand the key distinction: this is not Universal Basic Income (UBI) or social assistance. DP is the compensation you're entitled to for the use others make of your shared resources. You are a shareholder of Planet Earth who receives its dividends.

This dividend is paid from a central Common Fund , a kind of planetary treasury that is fed by three automatic and transparent sources:

1. RUAC: The aforementioned fee that is paid for the exclusive use of common resources.
2. Universal Partnership: A 50% share of all income.
3. Selective Oxidation: The recovery of the value of idle capital.

The main goal of Personal Development is to eradicate "existential blackmail," the systemic pressure that forces people to accept degrading jobs simply to survive. By ensuring basic needs are met, immense human potential is unleashed. Work ceases to be a "sentence" and becomes the "expression of your purpose and calling."

AU50, We Are All Partners, We All Take Care of Each Other, Including Businesses.

This principle redefines the relationship between the individual and the collective in wealth creation. It is called the 50/50 Universal Partnership (AU50). It is a planetary marriage among all humanity and establishes that all human beings are partners with each other, which includes any economic undertaking. By design, humanity is a 50/50 society. It is like a community property marriage among all humanity. The logic behind this division is not arbitrary, but a fair balance of contributions:

• The creator contributes: The idea, the work, and a portion of the risk.
• Society contributes: Venture Capital Investment (initial capital), infrastructure (roads, internet), a market of educated customers, legal stability, security and, fundamentally, all the scientific and technological knowledge accumulated throughout history.

In practice, 50% of the net profits from all business or private activity (salaries, rents, etc.) automatically flows into the Common Fund , becoming the second major source that finances your Planetary Dividend.

The most radical implication of this principle is seen when thinking about the future: if a Super intelligent Artificial Intelligence and robots were to create value on a massive scale, 50% of that wealth would automatically enrich all of humanity, eliminating the "specter of an elite controlling AI".

Money that stagnates, evaporates.

In the current system, money makes more money through compound interest, which incentivizes static accumulation, fuels cyclical crises, and significantly increases the cost of living for everyone. Demarchy reverses this logic with a mechanism called Selective Oxidation (or demurrage ). This is a system where idle capital "evaporates" or slowly depreciates (at a rate of, for example, 1% per month).

Its purpose is to replace interest as the driving force of the economy. Money no longer generates interest by sitting idle in a high-yield account; on the contrary, it evaporates. Instead of rewarding accumulation, the system incentivizes the flow of wealth and productive investment in resources that benefit us all. Wealth is forced to move, to finance new projects, to circulate within the economy, or else it loses value.

And where does that "rusted" value go? It is redistributed to everyone through the Common Fund , acting as an economic thermostat that prevents parasitic accumulation and ensures that capital is always at the service of creating real value.

Your selfishness becomes the driving force behind the common good

Perhaps the most counterintuitive idea of ​​all is that this system doesn't require people to become altruistic. On the contrary, its incentive architecture is designed so that, through pure Intelligent Selfishness , you actively desire and contribute to the success of others. This is achieved through two main mechanisms.

The first is the " High Tide Effect " . The system's currency, called the Universal Value Unit (UVU) , is linked to the value of the planet and has a fixed and limited amount.

Therefore, when the Total Planetary Value (TPV) increases—whether through technological innovation, forest restoration, or increased productivity—the value of each of your UVUs automatically increases. A rising tide lifts all boats.

The second principle is related to the others:

We are all 50% partners in each other, like a marriage with community property .

If 50% of your income, and that of others, is allocated to the Common Fund that finances your Planetary Dividend, the success of others directly enriches you and everyone else.

Thus, cooperation and mutual support cease to be a moral ideal and become the smartest financial strategy.

Redesigning our collective future

These five principles are just a sample of a much deeper systemic redesign. The central idea is not to try to change human nature, but to create an incentive architecture that manages to "channel it naturally and intelligently" in favor of the collective good It's like changing the "operating system of civilization," moving from an outdated code riddled with viruses (existential blackmail, compound interest, corruption) to an open-source, transparent, and self-optimizing one where every user is also an owner. The result is a system where individual freedom and collective prosperity not only coexist but reinforce each other.

And this leaves us with a final question for reflection: What if the key to a prosperous future is not working harder, but changing the rules of the game completely?

What is the Planetary Dividend? A Guide to Understanding Your Common Inheritance

Introduction: It's not charity, it's your right

The Planetary Dividend (PD) is a guaranteed monthly income that every citizen of Earth receives by virtue of being a co-owner of the planet . To truly understand this concept, we must abandon the idea that it is a gift or social assistance.

This rests on a fundamental principle that challenges traditional economics:

"It's not charity. It's not social assistance. It's your rightful share of the common property of humanity."

This idea is based on a radically simple premise about the possession of our world, one that redefines your place in it.

"The planet is not owned by anyone. Therefore, it belongs to everyone. The Planetary Dividend materializes that co-ownership in a concrete and verifiable economic right."

To understand this concept, we must begin with the most basic question of all: Who owns the world?

Who Owns the Earth?

The current system is based on a concept of ownership with a fundamental logical flaw, known as the "Original Ownership Problem." If we trace any title to a natural resource back to its origin, we discover that the first "owner" never bought it from anyone; they simply appropriated it. From this perspective, all private ownership of resources that no one created is, in essence, "institutionalized theft" from the human community

The demarc solution is simple: resources that no one created (the land, minerals, water, the atmosphere) are the common property of all humanity .

The Planetary Dividend is, therefore, the compensation you receive when an individual or company exclusively uses a portion of this shared resource. It's not a subsidy, but rather the return on your stake. It's like being a shareholder in the largest company, the planet : you receive dividends because you own a part of it.

This paradigm shift radically transforms your role in the world.

From Subject to Co-owner

Dimension	Current System	Planetary Demarchy
Premise on Resources	They can appropriate them privately without compensation.	They are universal co-ownership.
Your economic right	Does not exist.	Inherent, by being a co-owner
Nature of DP	Does not exist.	Property income, not charity.
Birth	Some with everything, some with nothing	All with guaranteed participation.
Inequality	Considered "natural".	Structurally indefensible

If you are a co-owner of the planet, the next question is obvious: where does the money come from to pay your share?

2. The Origin of Money: The 3 Sources of the Planetary Dividend

The Planetary Dividend is not financed by taxes on labor or consumption. It is funded by a centralized "Common Fund" that receives money from three main sources, all designed as fair compensation for the use of what belongs to everyone.

1. Royalty for Use of Common Assets (RUAC): A "rental" for using what belongs to everyone.
   • Explanation: This is a fee paid for the private use of shared resources such as oil, minerals, water, land, or the atmosphere (through emissions). If someone uses a shared asset for their exclusive benefit, they must compensate the other co-owners by depositing the payment into the Common Fund.
   • Example: When buying gasoline, you pay a RUAC both for the oil extracted (a common resource) and for the emissions generated by burning it (using the atmosphere as a dumping ground).
2. 50% Universal Partnership (AU50): We are all partners of each other.
   • Explanation: Instead of a tax, this is a model of society.
   • The Common Fund for companies acts as a capitalist partner that buys a 50% stake in all business economic activity.
   • In return, it not only provides capital but also handles all the administrative and accounting work, allowing entrepreneurs to focus exclusively on creating value. 50% of net profits flow into the Common Fund.
   • Example: An entrepreneur creates a company. The Common Fund becomes her 50% partner, handling the paperwork. If the company generates €1 million in profit, €500,000 goes to her and the other €500,000 goes to the Common Fund to be distributed among all the partners.
   • For private income, it directly collects 50% of the income received by all inhabitants of the planet.
3. Selective Oxidation (Demurrage): An incentive to get money moving.
   • Explanation: This is a mechanism designed to eliminate compound interest and act as an "economic thermostat." Money that remains "stuck" or unproductive slowly loses value (e.g., 1% per month). This value doesn't disappear; instead, it is transferred directly to the Common Fund to benefit the community, incentivizing productive investment over passive accumulation.
   • Example: If you have €100,000 saved without investing, that amount would gradually depreciate, encouraging you to mobilize it or, otherwise, to contribute passively to the well-being of all.

Now that we understand where the money comes from and that everything is centralized in the Common Fund, let's see how it is distributed so that the system balances itself automatically.

3. How Does It Work for You? Automatic Balance

The system creates a fair and automatic flow of value, without the need for political decisions. Your bottom line (what you earn or pay) depends directly on how much you consume from the common resources

The calculation is simple: all the money collected in the common fund, minus administration, healthcare, and other agreed-upon service expenses, is divided equally among all the inhabitants of the planet. Before paying each person, the portion of the RUAC (Universal Health Fund) corresponding to their consumption is deducted.

The Example of Maria and Carlos

Let's imagine that this month's Planetary Dividend is 1,000 units for each person

• Maria (Moderate Consumption):
  • Receives her DP: +1,000 units
  • Throughout the month, your consumption of resources (through products and services) generates a total RUAC payment of -200 units .
  • Net Balance: +800 units . Maria receives a net gain because her consumption of common resources is less than her share of planetary ownership. Her sustainable behavior is automatically rewarded.
• Carlos (High Consumption):
  • Receives his DP: +1,000 units (exactly the same as Maria).
  • Due to his lifestyle (large house, powerful car, frequent travel), his total RUAC payment is -1,500 units .
  • Net Balance: -500 units . Carlos ends up with a net cost. This isn't a punishment, but fair compensation. By using more common resources than average, he's compensating the other co-owners (like Maria) for that intensive use.

This "Osmotic Equilibrium" ensures that the system is fair by design. Naturally, such a transformative concept raises many questions.

4. Frequently Asked Questions: Clarifying the Main Doubts

A change of this magnitude invites skepticism. Here we answer the most common questions.

Won't this cause inflation?

No. In fact, monetary inflation is architecturally impossible. The Planetary Dividend redistributes existing value; it does not create new money . The total amount of money (Money Supply) does not change. In a mature Demarchic system, due to the system's architecture and its UVU currency, the Money Supply is identical to Real Output ( M ≡ Q ), meaning that it is mathematically impossible to "print money" without creating real value to back it.

Where does the money come from?

Money is not "printed". It comes from three legitimate sources of compensation:

1. RUAC: The "rent" for using common resources.
2. AU50: 50% of the profits of the entire economy, as a partner.
3. Oxidation: The value of stagnant money.

It is value that already exists in the economy and is simply redistributed fairly to reflect universal co-ownership.

Won't it make people lazy?

Historical precedents demonstrate that liberation from mechanical labor is the fuel of civilization:

• Classical Athens: It is cited as the supreme example where the liberation from heavy manual labor created a beacon of innovation that gave rise to Western culture. The economic security of its citizens, along with a demarc government, allowed for the flourishing of philosophy, art, science, and democracy by lot.

• The Renaissance and Patronage: A key rhetorical question arises: How many great inventors, artists, or scientists before the 19th century did not live off investments or patronage ? History demonstrates that the minds that transformed the world (like those of the Italian Renaissance in cities governed by lot) were not motivated by hunger, but by the possibility of dedicating themselves fully to their genius because their basic needs were met.

Contemporary and Psychosocial Evidence

Beyond history, modern basic income experiments contradict the laziness thesis:

• Empirical Studies: Cases in Alaska (oil dividend), Finland and Kenya show that economic security does not reduce employment, but increases well-being and mass entrepreneurship .

Is this communism?

No. Their principles are fundamentally opposed

Aspect	Communism	DP in the Demarchy
Private Property	It is eliminated.	It is protected and perpetuated.
Free markets	They are abolished	They function normally.
Entrepreneurship	Is discouraged.	Is encouraged (thanks to capitalization and the safety net).

It is closer to the classical liberalism of John Stuart Mill and Henry George than to Marxism.

Conclusion: A Verifiable Right for Universal Dignity

The Planetary Dividend is much more than an income; it is the manifestation of a new paradigm. These three concepts, interconnected in a self-reinforcing system, are the most important things to remember:

• It is your rightful share: It is not charity, but the return of your ownership of the common goods.
• It is mathematically fair: It is not a political decision, but the result of an automatic and verifiable calculation that rewards sustainability.
• Unleash human potential: Guarantee a foundation of dignity that allows people to innovate and pursue their vocation without fear of survival.

Ultimately, it is tangible proof of your heritage as an inhabitant of this world.

"You were born a partner of the planet and its businesses. The Planetary Dividend proves it every month."

Comparative Analysis: Planetary Demarchy versus Capitalism and Communism

1.0 Introduction: Three Models of Social Organization

This document aims to conduct a rigorous comparative analysis between the theoretical model of Planetary Demarchy and the established socioeconomic systems of capitalism and communism. The analysis will focus exclusively on the foundational axioms and operational mechanisms that define each system, as described in the source documentation, in order to contrast their internal logics and structural implications. To this end, three fundamentally different views of social organization will be examined:

• Capitalism: Characterized in the reference texts by the private ownership of natural resources, the appropriation of 100% of the profit by the value creator, and a governance based on representative democracy and professional politicians.
• Communism: Defined by state ownership of the means of production, where the state appropriates 100% of the value generated and the individual creator 0%, under a centralized power structure.
• Planetary Demarchy: A proposed model that starts from the axiom of " Universal Planetary Co-ownership" (UPC) , implementing value distribution mechanisms such as " Universal 50% Partnership" (AU50) and a governance model that combines citizen lottery with expert management.

The analysis will proceed to break down these differences into four key areas: resource ownership, wealth distribution, human incentives, and governance structure, with the aim of providing a clear overview of their paradigmatic divergences.

2.0 Axiomatic Foundation: The Question of Resource Ownership

The cornerstone that defines the internal logic of any socioeconomic system is its concept of property. The answer to the fundamental question, "Who owns the world?" determines the subsequent rules regarding the distribution of wealth, the legitimacy of power, and the individual's relationship to their environment. Each system is built upon a distinct property axiom, which generates radically different consequences The Planetary Demarchy model posits that the original appropriation of natural resources constitutes "institutionalized theft." Its argument centers on what it calls "The Problem of Original Ownership," articulated through a central question: "Who sold the Earth to the first owner?" The answer, according to the model, is "No one. They appropriated it unilaterally." This logical premise serves as the basis for proposing "Universal Planetary Co-ownership" (UPC) not as a moral ideal, but as a "non-negotiable ontological reality": since no human being has a superior birthright to another over a planet we all inherit, ownership must be equitable by default.

The following table directly compares each system's approach to the ownership of natural resources.

Property Dimension	Capitalism (Current System)	Communism	Planetary Demarchy
Founding Principle	Private appropriation of common resources without compensation to the community	Total state ownership of all means of production and resources.	Universal co-ownership of common resources by birthright.
Legitimacy of Ownership	It is justified through purchase, inheritance, or historical conquest.	It is justified by the State decree on behalf of the collective.	It is an inherent right simply by virtue of existing on the planet.
Individual Status	Tenant, subject, or potential purchaser of the resources.	User of the resources under the permission and control of the State	Legitimate co-owner and shareholder of the planetary heritage.

These axiomatic differences have profound implications. While both capitalism and communism place the individual in a subordinate position—whether to the private owner or the state—the concept of the common citizen in the Demarchy radically redefines this relationship. It transforms the citizen from a mere "tenant" or "subject" who must struggle for a place in the world into a "shareholder" with a verifiable and inalienable property right to the common patrimony. This theoretical foundation gives rise to the practical economic mechanisms that derive from it.

3.0 Mechanisms for the Creation and Distribution of Wealth

The property axioms of each system materialize in concrete economic mechanisms that govern value creation, profit distribution, and the financing of the social structure. These mechanisms are not arbitrary, but a logical consequence of their founding principles

3.1 Participation in the Value Generated

The way in which the benefits of economic activity are distributed is a key differentiator. Planetary Demarchy proposes the 50/50 Universal Partnership (AU50 ) , a model that contrasts sharply with the other two systems.

• In capitalism , the value creator (the entrepreneur or the company) appropriates 100% of the profits, also assuming 100% of the risk.
• In communism , the State appropriates 100% of the value generated, leaving the creator with 0% of the direct benefits.
• In the Planetary Demarchy , all income-generating activity (whether private or business-based) is considered a 50/50 partnership. 50% of the profits go to the creator, and the remaining 50% flows into a Common Fund to be distributed among all co-owners of the planet.

The justification for this 50/50 split is based on an accounting of contributions:

• The Creator contributes: The idea, the work and, if it is a company, a share of the risk.
• Society contributes: Capital, infrastructure (roads, internet), the market (customers), education, stability, laws, security, and accumulated knowledge (science, inherited technology).

3.2 Funding of the Collective

The methods for financing common services and structure also differ fundamentally

Capitalism is based on coercive taxes (such as VAT or income tax), which are seen as a subsequent extraction of value after its creation.

Communism is financed through the total appropriation of the value produced.

The Demarchy seeks to replace both with automatic mechanisms integrated into the economic flow.

The two main sources of funding for the Demarchy are:

• Royalty for the use of Common Assets (RUAC) : It is not defined as a tax, but as a "fee" or "royalty" that is paid for the private use of common resources (minerals, water, soil, electromagnetic spectrum).

This fee is applied only to final consumption, preventing double counting in the production chain. For example, when bottled water is purchased, the RUAC (Regulated Aquifer Consumption Tax) is applied to the water extracted from the shared aquifer; when gasoline is purchased, it is applied to the crude oil extracted. The principle is that those who consume more shared resources compensate the community more.

• 50% of the planet's productive capacity via a 50/50 Universal Partnership (AU50) . The principle is that we are all partners, so half of what we all earn goes into a common fund to be distributed equally among everyone.

• Selective Oxidation (Demurrage) : This is a mechanism that replaces compound interest. Capital that remains idle (uninvested) depreciates slowly (e.g., 1% per month), incentivizing its circulation and reinvestment in the productive economy. The "oxidized" value is redistributed to the Common Fund. It acts as an anti-accumulation mechanism and, fundamentally, as an "economic thermostat ." The oxidation rate can be algorithmically adjusted by the ASI (Argentine Institute of Securities) to regulate the velocity of money: it is increased to stimulate spending in a sluggish economy or reduced to encourage saving in an overheated one, serving as a non-political macroeconomic stabilization tool.

3.3 Citizen's Income

The result of these financing flows is the Planetary Dividend (PD) , a concept that must be distinguished from the situation in other systems

While in capitalism and communism there is no inherent right to a share of collective wealth, private property is presented as a direct consequence of ownership.

The fundamental distinction is that DP is not charity, a subsidy, or a Universal Basic Income (UBI) .

It is defined as an inalienable property right . Unlike a UBI, which typically depends on political will and is financed through taxes (a transfer of wealth), public ownership is the royalty that corresponds to each citizen for being a co-owner of the planet. It is the legitimate return for the use that others make of the common heritage.

These economic mechanisms, in turn, generate very different psychological and behavioral incentives in individuals.

4.0 Incentive Architecture and Human Behavior

Every system, intentionally or not, establishes an incentive architecture that shapes individual and collective behavior. The way in which reward, risk, fear, and security are managed determines the prevailing psychology of its citizens. The contrast in the motivational basis is one of the sharpest points of comparison:

• Capitalism ("Homo Debitum"): The current system operates on the basis of "existential blackmail." The fear of poverty, illness, or failure acts as the main driver for competition and the acceptance of jobs, even if they are not vocational. Economic survival is not guaranteed, which generates a state of permanent stress and defensiveness.
• Planetary Demarchy ("Homo Socius"): This model proposes an architecture of "Intelligent Selfishness." Personal interest is structurally aligned with collective well-being through mechanisms such as the AU50 and the " High Tide Effect . " The latter is based on a mathematical principle: the total number of monetary units (UVUs) is fixed. Therefore, when the Total Planetary Value increases (through innovation, ecological restoration, etc.), the value of each individual UVU , held by each citizen, automatically increases. This mechanism makes cooperation the "smartest financial strategy," since the success of one neighbor literally enriches the entire community. The Planetary Dividend seeks to eliminate existential fear in order to unleash "creative energy" and allow work to become a "chosen vocation."
• Communism: Its incentives are weak because it disconnects individual effort from personal gain. The state's total appropriation of the value generated reduces the motivation to innovate or exceed production quotas.

The treatment of risk and failure also reveals deep structural differences, as shown in the following table.

Aspect	Capitalism	Communism	Planetary Demarchy
Entrepreneurial Risk	Assumed 100% by the individual, with the potential for great reward or ruin	Controlled and discouraged by the State; private entrepreneurship does not exist.	Shared 50/50 with society through the Solidarity Risk Fund.
Consequence of Failure	Potential personal ruin, debt, and social stigma	Considered a failure of the state plan, with consequences for the planners.	A "collectively learned lesson" that encourages experimentation.

Finally, the Demarchy's postulate of " Mutual Interdependence " transforms cooperation into an act of financial rationality, in contrast to the competitive logic of capitalism and the forced collaboration of communism. However, beyond economic incentives, the power structure is equally crucial in defining the citizen's experience.

5.0 Governance Model and Power Structure

The way in which collective decisions are made and power is exercised is a key differentiator that determines a system's resilience, fairness, and ability to resist capture by special interests The analysis of each governance model reveals opposing architectures:

• Planetary Demarchy: Proposes a three-factor model that separates the definition of objectives, their execution, and the control body.
  • Citizen Assemblies (Lottery): Ordinary citizens, assisted by an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), are randomly selected for short terms. Their role is to define the "WHAT" : the ethical and strategic direction of society.
  • Professional Managers and ASI (Meritocracy): A body of experts, hired on merit and assisted by an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) , is in charge of executing the "HOW" : the technical and efficient implementation of citizen guidelines, with a ridiculously low administration cost as everything is automated.
  • Independent Auditors (CONTROL): They verify that both the Assembly and the Managers correctly fulfill their responsibilities.
• Capitalism (Current Governance): It is based on a system of representative democracy with "professional politicians ." Demarchy criticizes this model for creating a "caste" susceptible to capture by lobbies and corruption, where power is delegated and often distanced from the popular will.
• Communism: It is characterized by a centralized state control system , where a single party or a bureaucratic elite concentrates all decision-making power, without mechanisms for direct citizen participation.

Regarding anti-corruption mechanisms, the Demarchy focuses on an " Anti-Capture Architecture . " This is based on a combination of lotteries (making it impossible to bribe someone who hasn't yet been elected), mandatory monthly rotation (preventing the consolidation of power), a body of independent auditors who monitor the Assembly and Managers in real time, and " Radical Transparency " (all decisions and financial flows are auditable on a blockchain). It is argued that this design is structurally resistant to corruption, in contrast to the more fallible control mechanisms of other systems.

This translates into a very different status of citizen power:

• In capitalism , power is "delegated" to representatives.
• In communism , power is "concentrated" in the State.
• In the Planetary Demarchy , power is distributed equally among all citizens, preventing its accumulation through randomly selected Assemblies of 1,000 members with monthly rotation. Assemblies, as isolated individuals, have no power; power resides solely in the mathematical coincidence of their votes.

These axiomatic and mechanical differences in governance, economics, and incentives lead to radically different visions of society, which are summarized in the conclusion.

6.0 Conclusion: Comparative Synthesis of Paradigms

This analysis has highlighted the profound structural differences between Planetary Demarchy, capitalism, and communism. Far from being variations on the same theme, they represent fundamentally different paradigms that stem from opposing answers to the question of resource ownership. The universal "Co-ownership" of Demarchy stands as the central axiom that distinguishes it from both the "Private Appropriation" of capitalism and the "State Ownership" of communism

The practical consequences of these axiomatic differences can be summarized in the following key points of contrast:

• Source of Basic Income: Salario/Beneficio vs. Asignación Estatalvs. Dividendo de Propiedad (DP).
• Public Financing Mechanism: Impuestos Coercitivos vs. Apropiación Estatalvs. Royalties y Participación (RUAC/AU50).
• Main Incentive: Miedo/Competencia vs. Deber Estatalvs. Interdependencia/Egoísmo Inteligente.
• Power Structure: Democracia Representativa vs. Estado Centralizadovs. Democracia Directa (Sorteo).

Ultimately, Planetary Demarchy presents itself not as a moral ideology, but as an "institutional engineering blueprint ." Its design seeks to align individual incentives with collective well-being in an automatic, mathematically verifiable, and structurally transparent way, proposing a systemic alternative to the models that have dominated the modern era.